ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 23 September 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.142026
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, A.

Original articles

Prospective cohort study to test the predictability of the Cardiff and Vale Paediatric Early Warning System (C&VPEWS)

Elizabeth Dawn Edwards 1*, Colin V Powell 2, Brendan W Mason 3 and Alison Oliver 2

1 Swansea NHS Trust, United Kingdom
2 Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, United Kingdom
3 Cardiff University, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dawn{at}llandybie89.freeserve.co.uk.

Accepted 8 September 2008


*   Abstract

Objective: To develop and test the predictability of a paediatric early warning score to identify children at risk of developing critical illness.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Admissions to all paediatric wards at the University Hospital of Wales.

Outcome measures: Respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, paediatric high dependency unit admission, paediatric intensive care unit admission, and death.

Results: Data were collected on 1000 patients. A single abnormal observation determined by the Cardiff and Vale Paediatric Early Warning System (C&VPEWS) had a 89.0% sensitivity (95% CI, 80.5 - 94.1), 63.9% specificity (95% CI,63.8 - 63.9), 2.2% positive predictive value (95% CI, 2.0 – 2.3) and a 99.8% negative predictive value (95% CI, 99.7 - 99.9) for identifying children who subsequently had an adverse outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the C&VPEWS score was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82 – 0.91).

Conclusion: Identifying children likely to develop critical illness can be difficult. The assessment tool developed from the Advanced Paediatric Life Support guidelines on identifying sick children appears to be sensitive but not specific. If the C&VPEWS was used as a trigger to activate a rapid response team (RRT) to assess the child, the majority of calls would be unnecessary.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health